Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Sci Transl Med ; 14(662): eabn5168, 2022 09 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2308193

RESUMEN

Although it has been more than 2 years since the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, COVID-19 continues to be a worldwide health crisis. Despite the development of preventive vaccines, therapies to treat COVID-19 and other inflammatory diseases remain a major unmet need in medicine. Our study sought to identify drivers of disease severity and mortality to develop tailored immunotherapy strategies to halt disease progression. We assembled the Mount Sinai COVID-19 Biobank, which was composed of almost 600 hospitalized patients followed longitudinally through the peak of the pandemic in 2020. Moderate disease and survival were associated with a stronger antigen presentation and effector T cell signature. In contrast, severe disease and death were associated with an altered antigen presentation signature, increased numbers of inflammatory immature myeloid cells, and extrafollicular activated B cells that have been previously associated with autoantibody formation. In severely ill patients with COVID-19, lung tissue-resident alveolar macrophages not only were drastically depleted but also had an altered antigen presentation signature, which coincided with an influx of inflammatory monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages. In addition, we found that the size of the alveolar macrophage pool correlated with patient outcome and that alveolar macrophage numbers and functionality were restored to homeostasis in patients who recovered from COVID-19. These data suggest that local and systemic myeloid cell dysregulation are drivers of COVID-19 severity and modulation of alveolar macrophage numbers and activity in the lung may be a viable therapeutic strategy for the treatment of critical inflammatory lung diseases.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Macrófagos Alveolares , Humanos , Pulmón , Macrófagos , Monocitos
2.
Chest ; 158(4): 1499-1514, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-805272

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of tracheostomy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains unknown. The goal of this consensus statement is to examine the current evidence for performing tracheostomy in patients with respiratory failure from COVID-19 and offer guidance to physicians on the preparation, timing, and technique while minimizing the risk of infection to health care workers (HCWs). METHODS: A panel including intensivists and interventional pulmonologists from three professional societies representing 13 institutions with experience in managing patients with COVID-19 across a spectrum of health-care environments developed key clinical questions addressing specific topics on tracheostomy in COVID-19. A systematic review of the literature and an established modified Delphi consensus methodology were applied to provide a reliable evidence-based consensus statement and expert panel report. RESULTS: Eight key questions, corresponding to 14 decision points, were rated by the panel. The results were aggregated, resulting in eight main recommendations and five additional remarks intended to guide health-care providers in the decision-making process pertinent to tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19-related respiratory failure. CONCLUSION: This panel suggests performing tracheostomy in patients expected to require prolonged mechanical ventilation. A specific timing of tracheostomy cannot be recommended. There is no evidence for routine repeat reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing in patients with confirmed COVID-19 evaluated for tracheostomy. To reduce the risk of infection in HCWs, we recommend performing the procedure using techniques that minimize aerosolization while wearing enhanced personal protective equipment. The recommendations presented in this statement may change as more experience is gained during this pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Traqueostomía , COVID-19 , Protocolos Clínicos , Consenso , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Humanos , Pandemias , Selección de Paciente , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas
3.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 24(6): 383-384, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-736804

RESUMEN

How to cite this article: Chaddha U, Kaul V, Agrawal A. What is the True Mortality in the Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19? Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(6):383-384.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA